The Bombay Cocktail is an obscure bit of greatness from Harry Craddock’s 1930 Savoy Cocktail Book. If anise or absinthe is part of your palate, if the Sazerac or the Corpse Reviver are on your regular list of suspects, then spend some time with the Bombay.

In the Savoy, the drink is officially known as the “Bombay Cocktail (No. 2).” *  Craddock’s original recipe matches brandy with a hefty dose of vermouth and a very light seasoning of curaçao and absinthe. He’s heavy-handed with the vermouth—equal parts of brandy and combined vermouths. I like vermouth as much as the next guy, but this is the wrong place to put it up front. The Bombay works better as a brandy-driven cocktail, with much-reduced proportions of sweet and dry vermouths.

The Bombay Cocktail (No. 2), at Cold Glass. Photo © 2011 Douglas M. Ford. All rights reserved.
The Bombay Cocktail

So here’s my vernacular take on the Bombay Cocktail:

The Bombay Cocktail

  • 1½ oz brandy (Remy VSOP)
  • ¼ oz dry vermouth (Noilly Prat)
  • ¼ oz sweet vermouth (M&R Rosso)
  • ¼ teaspoon curaçao (Grand Marnier)
  • ⅛ teaspoon absinthe (Kübler)

Stir with ice until very cold, strain into a chilled cocktail glass. Express and garnish with lemon.

Charmingly small, eh? The Bombay works very well as a small drink, one you can finish while it is still very cold. Sweetness is the enemy of this drink—that’s one of the reasons to keep the vermouth proportion low.

Even the small amount of Grand Marnier I used here will be cloying if you give it time to warm up. I still don’t have any dasher bottles, so I’m going with a quarter teaspoon; it just works, if it’s cold cold cold. The original recipe calls for “2 dashes” of Curaçao, so it’s pretty clear that Craddock didn’t intend the curaçao to be sweetening the drink; he was, perhaps, balancing an absinthe that was less sweet than the Kübler.

* There is, of course, a “Bombay Cocktail (No. 1),” a true obscurity, made with the mysterious and unobtainable “East Indian Punch.” Though just a footnote to cocktail history, it does suggest how the (No. 2), which has no obvious relationship to the flavors of India, could get attached to the name “Bombay.” The East Indian Punch would have given the (No. 1) at least a sensible connection to the “Bombay” appellation; I speculate that it was becoming difficult to source even as Craddock wrote, and so he developed the (No. 2) to keep the Bombay Cocktail name alive. Its more easily sourced ingredients would have let him continue to fill orders, even with the flavors changed. How different is the revised flavor profile? We can’t know, but I’m guessing it’s radically different. So there’s a mystery for historians, to discover what that “East Indian Punch” might have tasted like.